UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. — Rocks once buried deep in ancient subduction zones — where tectonic plates collide — could help scientists make better predictions of how these zones behave during the years between major earthquakes, according to a research team from Penn State and Brown University.
Clues from rock formations in Alaska and Japan allowed the scientists to develop a new model to predict the pressure solution activity in subduction zones, the researchers reported in the journal Science Advances. Sedimentary rocks comprise grains surrounded by water-containing pores. When rocks are squeezed together under great pressure, the grains dissolve at their boundaries into the water present in pores, forming pressure solution. This allows the rocks to deform, or change shape, influencing how the tectonic plates slide past each other.
“It’s like when you go ice skating — the blade on the surface ends up melting the ice, which allows you to glide along,” said corresponding author Donald Fisher, professor of geosciences at Penn State. “In rocks, what happens is quartz grains dissolve at stressed contacts and the dissolved material moves to cracks where it precipitates.”
The world’s most powerful earthquakes happen in subduction zones, where one tectonic plate slides beneath the other. When these plates become stuck together, stress builds in the crust of the Earth — like a rubber band being stretched. When enough stress builds up to overcome the friction holding the plates together — like a rubber band snapping — an earthquake occurs.
“We’ve shown that pressure solution is a fundamental process during the interseismic period in subduction zones,” Fisher said. “The occurrence of this pressure solution can really affect the amount of elastic strain that accumulates in different parts of the seismogenic zone.”
Pressure solution is difficult to explore in the laboratory because it typically occurs very slowly over thousands to millions of years, Fisher said. Speeding up the process in the lab requires higher temperatures, which produces other changes in rocks that impact the experiments.
The scientists instead turned to rocks that once experienced these tectonic pressures and were later brought to the surface by geological processes. The rocks show microscopic shears — or breaks caused by strain — that contain textures that provide evidence for pressure solution, the scientists said.
“This work allows us to test a flow law, or model, that describes the rate of pressure solution in ancient rocks that were once down at the plate boundary and have been exhumed to the surface,” Fisher said. “And we can apply this to active margins that are moving today.”
A previous study by another team of scientists linked stress the rocks experienced and strain rate — or how much they deformed. In the new work, Fisher and his colleague, Greg Hirth, professor at Brown University, created a more detailed model that considers factors like the rocks’ grain size and solubility, or how much of the rock material can dissolve into liquid.
“We were able to parameterize the solubility as a function of temperature and pressure, in a practical way that hadn’t been done before,” Fisher said. “So now we can plug in numbers — different grain sizes, different temperatures, different pressures and get the strain rate out of that.”
The results can help reveal where in the seismogenic layer — the range of depths at which most earthquakes occur — that strain is occurring.
The researchers applied their model to the Cascadia Subduction Zone, an active fault that runs from northern California to Canada and by major cities like Portland, Oregon, Seattle and Vancouver, British Columbia.
The temperature along the plate boundary and the amount of strain built up is well studied there, and the results of their model match crustal movements based on satellite observations, the scientists said.
“Cascadia is a great example because it’s late in the interseismic period — it’s been 300 years since the last major earthquake,” Fisher said. “We may experience one in our lifetime, which would be the biggest natural disaster that North America can anticipate in terms of the potential for shaking and resulting tsunami.”
The National Science Foundation supported this work.