UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. — Penn State students won first place in four categories and second place in one category at the 2022 Architectural Engineering Institute International Student Design Competition in Arlington, Texas. The team, named CaliberX, comprises students majoring in architectural engineering, each with a focus in a construction, lighting/electrical, mechanical or structural option area.
The annual competition is hosted by the Architectural Engineering Institute, part of the American Society of Civil Engineers, and encourages multidisciplinary teams to consider “how engineered systems enhance and integrate with each other and the architecture of the building,” according to the program’s website. This is the 10th year that Penn State has participated in the competition, and this year’s winnings bring Penn State’s total award count to 66.
“In the Penn State Department of Architectural Engineering, we emphasize a system-of-systems perspective in the planning, design, construction and operation of our built environment,” said Sez Atamturktur Russcher, Harry and Arlene Schell Professor and head of the Department of Architectural Engineering. “Through the AEI design competition, our students put their technical knowledge in practice by considering interdependencies among various building systems and the downstream effects of their design decisions in their respective specializations: electrical/lighting, mechanical, structural and construction systems.”
Participating teams are given a written design proposal for a specified building in a real location. Parameters of budget, square footage and use are detailed in the program, which also includes design challenges tailored to risks or needs of the location.
This year, participating students were tasked with designing a student success center for Tarrant County College, a public community college in Texas. In addition to proposing engineered building systems that would meet the needs of Tarrant students, participating teams also had to include design adjustments that would allow the building to withstand natural disasters, specifically an EF3 tornado, as well as include safe room spaces that could meet the requirements to withstand an EF4 tornado. The teams also were required to provide a plan for operating without power-grid support at various levels and time periods.