UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. — When James Johnson chose his research dissertation, the general feeling among that era’s academics was that it was ill-defined, elusive and a scientifically useless construct.
More than four decades later, Johnson remains gratified that he chose child play as his line of research. An elaboration and diversification of so many different means of doing credible research on the subject and the acceptance of the hypothesis that play is a very important construct in child development was something Johnson always believed could happen when he was a graduate student at Wayne State University in Detroit in the 1970s.
He helped with systematic research at Wayne State on play of children ages 3 to 5 and he also found professors at different universities and attended conferences in the early 1970s about how certain forms of adult-guided play could help children in their early development.
A professor of education since 1983 and for 31 years professor-in-charge of early childhood education in the Penn State College of Education’s Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Johnson said child play was known early in his career as the Ugly Duckling of educational behavioral sciences because it seemed too vague a concept and hard to define in research.
“But some of us thought that it's not an ugly duckling but a beautiful swan,” he said. “That's proven to be the case, but I didn't realize that at the time; it was more of a gut-level feeling that it has to be important. I was the oldest of five children growing up and I had a lot of experiences directly as a child and I just knew how important it is.”
Play, according to Johnson, is a state of mind. “And it’s also a behavior. There are 156 definitions of 'play' in the Oxford Dictionary, so it’s unwieldy,” he said. “It’s an essential ingredient in life, right up there with loving and working. A harmonious theory of play is that you have to balance working, loving and playing.”
Today, if older people are asked to describe their play when they were a child, they admit it was a very important part of their lives, according to Johnson. “I just know that it helped with my mental and social/emotional development and creativity and imagination, so I think there was a lot of intuition that was really important,” Johnson said. “But it was very difficult to find empirical methods that could systematically research it. And that is still a difficult problem. But there's more openness, I think, to pursuing research.”
He said the Society for Research and Child Development is having a conference in St. Louis in April that's devoted to play, imagination and creativity. “That's really encouraging and I think some of our funding agencies are about ready to consider directly funding research on play, and it hasn't always been that way,” Johnson said.
“And when you do turn to the humanities and qualitative research methods, and they're considered credible research, there's more acceptance of the hypothesis that play is a very important construct in child development.”