ABINGTON, Pa. — Today’s sex workers use the internet to attract clients, shape personas, share information, screen potential clients and build community, according to a new book from a Penn State faculty member. Kurt Fowler, assistant professor of criminal justice at Penn State Abington, applied an approach called narrative criminology in his new book "The Rise of Digital Sex Work" (NYU Press) to provide an intimate look into the changing face of the industry, telling stories of workers and revealing how they go online to share information, grow their businesses and establish global communities.
“There is a cultural perception about sex work, and reading their stories can alter that,” Fowler said. “Digital sex work is changing the shape of what it means to be a sex worker in the 21st century. They want to have more say in when, where and why they choose to work. We rarely hear from the workers themselves, and the underlying meaning of their stories are important to all of us.”
Fowler conducted 50 in-depth interviews with workers from industrialized countries worldwide who provide services ranging from web-camming to escorting. He offers insight into how race, class and privilege affect their work and the role of the internet and explores how they manage their daily business and client relationships, their use of digital technology for safety and as a broader social resource, and the role race plays in their work.
"These are not just sterile measurements. These are human beings with human stories, and in order to understand the sociological consequences we need context, which my book provides. Their stories say more about us than the workers and how we choose to frame it reflects society’s understanding. Digital sex work is on the rise, and it has nothing to do with sex work. It’s all about our digital lives,” he said.
There are striking differences, Fowler explained, between traditional and digital sex workers.
“Most of the people I interviewed were highly educated, white, middle-class women with a median age of 28, which is older than cultural stereotypes. But it says something about the network in this subculture that only people who are feeling secure in their position in life and society are comfortable talking to me about their illegal behavior. Someone with a pimp or who is on drugs likely won't talk to me,” he said.
“Those variables speak to their own personal sense of security; it’s not a risk to talk to me. At first it was difficult finding workers to interview, but then word got out through emails and other means that I had no agenda. The difference is agency: ‘I have the choice of clients and to talk about my work or not,’” Fowler said.